Send us 10 documents from your current project. We extract, reconcile, and show you exactly what we find in 48 hours, before any contract.
If the accuracy isn't what we promised, you owe us nothing.
Connect with Pathnovo to discuss your engineering document intelligence needs.
Email: hello@pathnovo.com
Send us a message, and we'll get back to you shortly.
You can also stay connected through our official social media channels.
Our Offices
Bangalore Office
Unit 101, OXFORD TOWERS 139, Old HAL Airport Rd, Kodihalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560008
Top 1% on Upwork
AI-Led Document Intelligence
Services as Software
Automated validation: P&ID vs instrument index vs datasheet vs C&E matrix. Catches tag conflicts, SIL misclassifications, and revision drift before handover QA, SIL verification, or audit.
Send us 10 documents from your current project. We extract, reconcile, and show you exactly what we find in 48 hours, before any contract.
If the accuracy isn't what we promised, you owe us nothing.
On most EPC projects, the C&E matrix is built from one P&ID revision and the tag register from a later one. SIL classification decisions reference tags that have been renumbered or relocated. This surfaces at SIL verification, when commissioning is six weeks away. Nobody has time to manually cross-check 5,000 drawings against 20,000 datasheets. We automate the entire reconciliation every tag, every field, every revision.
P&ID vs instrument index, datasheet vs tag register, C&E matrix vs P&ID tag list, and revision-to-revision comparisons across any document pair in your set.
We compare every revision against the previous version and against related documents. Changes, additions, and new conflicts are flagged with specific field-level references.
Yes. We validate C&E matrix safety interlock logic against the extracted P&ID tag list. SIL classification discrepancies are flagged before your SIL verification engineer begins.
On a typical EPC project with 5,000+ P&IDs, we find 500-2,000+ conflicts that would otherwise surface at handover QA. In our Gulf project, we found 1,847 discrepancies across 12,000 P&IDs.
We flag every conflict with source references, affected fields, and suggested resolution. Your engineering team reviews and approves. We track resolution status through to completion.
A structured comparison of what changed between two revisions of a document — added tags, deleted tags, modified parameters, and new conflicts with related documents.
Yes. We ingest from multiple EDMS, SharePoint, network drives, or email archives. Source system does not matter — we reconcile the data.
Our models track tag identity across renumbering events. If tag 101-FV-001 becomes 101-XV-001, we maintain the linkage and flag downstream impacts.
Conflict reports with source document references, field-level comparisons, severity classification, and resolution tracking. Exportable to Excel, PDF, or direct system import.
Yes. Our agents can monitor your EDMS and re-run reconciliation automatically when new revisions are issued.
Yes. Tags that appear in the register but not in any P&ID, or in a P&ID but missing from the datasheet set, are flagged as orphans.
Each vendor may use different conventions. We normalise across vendors before reconciliation so conflicts are real engineering issues, not format differences.
99.5% on safety-critical fields. We catch conflicts that manual review misses because we check every field in every document, not samples.
Yes. We validate that every document in the MDR exists, is the correct revision, and has been extracted and reconciled.
Reconciliation results feed directly into handover package completeness scoring. QA teams get a clean/not-clean status per tag before submission.