Graph-Co
Alternative: Multi-Platform vs COMOS-Only
Graph-Co serves Siemens COMOS customers exclusively: P&ID to COMOS conversion as the only workflow. Pathnovo serves COMOS + AVEVA + Hexagon + Bentley + SAP + Maximo + Cognite + Wrench + Aconex + plain Excel + JSON output. Multi-platform output, 15+ document types (P&IDs, isometrics, datasheets, HAZOP studies, mill certificates, plus more), 99.5% contractual SLA, transparent credit-based pricing (full platform on every paid tier), Indian + Gulf delivery, Indian regulatory layer (IBR / OISD / PESO / CCOE). For COMOS-pure ecosystem buyers, Graph-Co's narrow specialism is a valid choice. For most owner-operators with multi-vendor histories or non-COMOS targets, Pathnovo's broader scope wins. See pricing for plans.
Multi-Platform Output (Not COMOS-Only)
Graph-Co's output target is Siemens COMOS exclusively. Pathnovo emits structured data for COMOS + AVEVA AIM + Hexagon HxGN SDx2 + Bentley iTwin + SAP PM + IBM Maximo + Cognite Data Fusion + Wrench SmartProject + Oracle Aconex + plain Excel + JSON + CFIHOS XML + ISO 15926 RDF. Most owner-operators have multi-vendor histories; Pathnovo extracts uniformly across all source formats and feeds whichever AIM / EAM / DataOps platform the customer has chosen, with no platform lock-in.
15+ Document Types (Not P&ID-Only)
Graph-Co handles P&IDs only (the conversion-to-COMOS workflow). Pathnovo handles 15+ engineering document types: P&IDs + isometrics + datasheets + HAZOP studies + mill certificates + valve lists + I/O lists + line lists + equipment lists + MDR + IBR Form IV + PESO Form XIV/XV + vendor data books. Full EPC project document scope, not single-workflow tool.
99.5% Contractual SLA + Named Customer Benchmarks
Graph-Co claims 99.9% accuracy on COMOS conversion specifically; methodology + named-customer benchmarks not publicly published. Pathnovo's 99.5% measured accuracy on McDermott live engagement (10,247 tags / 600 P&IDs) is the largest published P&ID extraction benchmark with field-level audit + bounding-box source evidence. Different commitment model: contractual SLA + verifiable named-customer benchmarks vs marketing accuracy claim. See /benchmarks for full methodology.
Indian + Gulf Delivery + Regulatory Layer
Graph-Co is Germany-based with European customer focus. No India / Gulf operating presence or regulatory expertise. Pathnovo has Indian PSU rate-card compatibility (IOCL, BPCL, HPCL, ONGC, GAIL), Gulf NOC delivery (ADNOC, Aramco, Petronas, KOC), and Indian regulatory bundle (IBR Form III/IV, OISD 118 HAZOP, PESO Form XIV/XV, CCOE licence registers) included in every Indian + Gulf engagement. For Indian + Gulf process industry customers, Pathnovo is materially differentiated.
Transparent Credit-Based Pricing
Graph-Co's pricing is custom per-engagement (not publicly published). Pathnovo's pricing is transparent on our pricing page: credit-based, full platform included on every paid tier. Annual contracts get 25% more credits at the same monthly price. Free 14-day trial with 100 credits before commercial commitment. Predictable cost-of-ownership for procurement budgeting. See pricing for plans.
Pathnovo Also Outputs to COMOS
For COMOS-committed customers needing both P&ID-to-COMOS conversion AND broader engineering document scope, Pathnovo's COMOS-compatible output covers the conversion workflow alongside isometric / datasheet / HAZOP / mill cert workflows that Graph-Co does not address. Pathnovo + Siemens COMOS coexist; Graph-Co alone covers only the conversion layer. See /alternatives/comos for the broader COMOS comparison framing.
| Feature | Pathnovo | Graph-Co |
|---|---|---|
| P&ID to COMOS conversion | ||
| Multi-platform output (COMOS + AVEVA + Hexagon + Bentley + SAP + Maximo) | ||
| 15+ engineering document types beyond P&IDs | ||
| Isometric MTO from scanned drawings | ||
| HAZOP register extraction from completed studies | ||
| Mill certificate traceability (180,000+ formats) | ||
| Vendor datasheet compliance check | ||
| MR package assembly + TBE automation | ||
| Tag-document register (live with McDermott) | ||
| Cross-document verification (5-layer) | ||
| C&E matrix vs P&ID verification (SIS safety) | ||
| ISA 5.1 native training | COMOS-specific | |
| CFIHOS 2.0 + ISO 15926 native output | Limited | |
| Indian regulatory bundle (IBR / OISD / PESO / CCOE) | ||
| Indian PSU rate-card compatibility | ||
| Gulf NOC delivery + Arabic-capable | ||
| 99.5% contractual accuracy SLA + remedy clause | 99.9% marketing claim | |
| Named customer benchmarks (McDermott 10,247 tags / 99.5% measured) | ||
| Per-sheet audit trail with bounding-box source evidence | ||
| Pre-certified SAP PM + IBM Maximo + AVEVA AIM data feeds | ||
| Free 14-day trial, 100 credits, no card | ||
| Transparent published pricing | Credit-based | Custom (not published) |
| 48-hour managed service turnaround SLA | Custom timeline | |
| Siemens COMOS specialism + ecosystem depth | Output supported | |
| European delivery + GDPR data residency | ||
| Pricing | Credit-based. Full platform on every paid tier. Free 14-day trial. See our pricing page for plans. | Custom per-engagement (not publicly published) |
Siemens COMOS Alternative
Broader Siemens COMOS comparison framing; Pathnovo as multi-platform alternative for owner-operators not committed to COMOS.
P&ID Data Extraction Pillar
Pathnovo's productised P&ID extraction with multi-platform output.
Tag-Document Register (live with McDermott)
Largest published P&ID extraction benchmark: 10,247 tags / 600 P&IDs / 99.5% measured accuracy.
Pathnovo Benchmarks
Named-customer benchmark methodology + competitor comparison.
Asset Information Management
AIM register pillar with multi-platform output: COMOS + AVEVA + Hexagon + Bentley + SAP + Maximo + Cognite.
Indian EPC Compliance Bundle
IBR / OISD / PESO / CCOE compliance views; not addressed by Graph-Co's COMOS specialism.
P&ID Extraction Software Comparison
Pathnovo vs IPS, Acuvate, NovekAI, PlantFCE, Levian, Hexagon SDx2, AVEVA Diagrams, Outerport, Reducto, Scry AI, Quantiphi, and Graph-Co.
What does Graph-Co do?
Graph-Co (Germany, est. ~2020) is a niche P&ID-to-Siemens-COMOS conversion specialist. Their workflow: AI-driven extraction of P&ID content into object-oriented COMOS models, claimed 99.9% accuracy. Managed service delivery from Germany. Narrow but deep specialism: only P&ID-to-COMOS conversion, only Siemens COMOS as the output target. Targets process industry customers committed to Siemens COMOS as the engineering backbone.
Is Pathnovo a Graph-Co alternative for COMOS customers?
Yes, with broader scope. For COMOS-committed customers needing P&ID-to-COMOS conversion plus broader engineering document scope, Pathnovo provides COMOS-compatible output for the P&ID conversion workflow + isometric MTO + datasheet extraction + HAZOP register + mill cert traceability + procurement intelligence chain + Indian regulatory bundle (IBR / OISD / PESO / CCOE). Graph-Co handles only the P&ID-to-COMOS conversion layer. For owner-operators with multi-vendor histories (where some plants are on COMOS, others on AVEVA / Hexagon / Bentley / legacy AutoCAD), Pathnovo's multi-platform output is materially more flexible than Graph-Co's COMOS-only specialism.
Can Graph-Co handle non-COMOS engineering platforms?
No. Graph-Co's product is purpose-built for Siemens COMOS as the output target. AVEVA AIM, Hexagon HxGN SDx2, Bentley iTwin, Cognite Data Fusion, SAP PM, IBM Maximo are not addressed by Graph-Co's product. For owner-operators on these platforms (the majority of the global market), Graph-Co does not fit; Pathnovo's multi-platform output covers all of them with consistent extraction quality and CFIHOS 2.0 + ISO 15926 native output.
Does Graph-Co offer non-P&ID document workflows?
Graph-Co's published focus is P&ID-to-COMOS conversion specifically. Isometric MTO, datasheet extraction, HAZOP register extraction, mill certificate traceability, and procurement intelligence workflows are not addressed by Graph-Co's product. For full EPC project document scope across 15+ document types, Pathnovo is the integrated alternative; Graph-Co handles one workflow within that scope (P&ID conversion to COMOS) for COMOS-committed customers.
How does Graph-Co's 99.9% accuracy claim compare to Pathnovo's 99.5%?
Different scopes + methodologies. Graph-Co's 99.9% claim is on COMOS conversion specifically (a narrower workflow than Pathnovo's broader extraction-to-multi-platform). Methodology, audit process, and named-customer benchmarks for Graph-Co's accuracy claim are not publicly published. Pathnovo's 99.5% is field-level measured on McDermott live engagement (10,247 tags / 600 P&IDs) with independent QA audit, per-sheet bounding-box source evidence, and contractual SLA + remedy clause. Different commitment models: Graph-Co marketing claim, Pathnovo verified contractual benchmark. See /benchmarks for full methodology.
Is Pathnovo as deep on COMOS as Graph-Co?
Graph-Co's specialism is COMOS ecosystem depth (object hierarchy modelling, COMOS attribute mapping, COMOS rule engine integration). For COMOS-pure ecosystem buyers needing the deepest COMOS-native conversion, Graph-Co's specialist depth is unmatched. Pathnovo's COMOS output is sufficient for the conversion workflow but does not match Graph-Co's narrow specialism. The trade-off: Pathnovo gives you 80-90% of Graph-Co's COMOS specialism + 100% of the broader engineering document scope (15+ document types, multi-platform output, Indian regulatory layer). For most owner-operators, the broader scope wins. For COMOS-pure customers with no other engineering AI scope, Graph-Co's specialist depth may be the right call.
What's the pricing comparison?
Graph-Co's pricing is custom per-engagement, not publicly published. Pathnovo's pricing is transparent on our pricing page: credit-based, full platform included on every paid tier. Free 14-day trial with 100 credits before commercial commitment. For procurement teams comparing total cost-of-ownership, Pathnovo's transparent credit-based pricing is materially easier to budget than Graph-Co's custom-engagement model. See pricing for plans.
Can Pathnovo and Graph-Co coexist?
Yes, in narrow cases. For COMOS-committed customers wanting Graph-Co's specialist COMOS conversion depth on the P&ID workflow specifically + Pathnovo's broader scope on isometrics + datasheets + HAZOP + mill certs + procurement intelligence + Indian regulatory bundle, the two can run in parallel without functional overlap on those scopes. Most COMOS-committed owner-operators evaluating both products converge on Pathnovo for the broader scope; Graph-Co's specialist depth becomes optional rather than essential when Pathnovo's COMOS-compatible output is good-enough for the conversion workflow.
See what your documents actually contain.
Send us 10 documents from your current project. We extract, reconcile, and show you exactly what we find in 48 hours, before any contract.
If the accuracy isn't what we promised, you owe us nothing.