Safety Study Types
HAZAN, What-If, FMEA Overview
Process plants conduct multiple safety study types across the project lifecycle: HAZID (hazard identification), HAZOP (deviation analysis), HAZAN (consequence analysis), What-If (open-ended hazard discovery), LOPA (layer of protection quantification), and FMEA (failure mode and effects analysis). Each study type serves a specific safety lifecycle stage; greenfield projects typically conduct HAZID, HAZOP, LOPA, and FMEA in sequence.
What is Safety Study Types in full?
Safety study types in EPC projects cover the safety lifecycle from early-stage hazard identification through detailed quantification. HAZID (Hazard Identification Study) is the early-stage open hazard search during conceptual design. HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) is the structured node-by-node deviation analysis using P&IDs. HAZAN (Hazard Analysis) is the consequence and frequency quantification. What-If is the open-ended hazard discussion using engineering judgement. LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis) is the semi-quantitative SIL classification method. FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) is the systematic failure mode review used in equipment and reliability engineering. Each study type serves a specific safety lifecycle stage.
What context and detail applies to Safety Study Types?
Safety study lifecycle
Typical safety lifecycle in greenfield EPC: HAZID at conceptual / FEED stage (siting and layout decisions), HAZOP at detailed design (P&ID-driven deviation analysis), LOPA following HAZOP (SIL classification), FMEA on critical equipment (reliability and failure mode review), Pre-Startup Safety Review (PSSR) at mechanical completion, Operations safety reviews (incident-driven). Each study type produces structured findings that flow into the project safety lifecycle deliverables.
HAZAN and What-If
HAZAN (Hazard Analysis) is a structured consequence and frequency quantification for specific hazard scenarios. HAZAN may use Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) methods to compute consequence in deaths, monetary loss, or environmental damage. What-If is the open-ended hazard discussion using engineering judgement and structured 'what if?' questions. What-If is typically used at early design stages or for incident investigation; HAZAN is used for specific high-criticality hazards requiring quantitative assessment.
FMEA in process industries
FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) is the systematic review of failure modes per component or equipment item. FMEA outputs a structured table of failure modes, effects, severity ratings, detection ratings, and risk priority numbers (RPN). FMEA is widely used in automotive and aerospace per AIAG / VDA standards; in process industries FMEA is used for critical rotating equipment reliability engineering and safety system design.
How is Safety Study Types used in EPC projects?
- 01
Greenfield refinery, petrochemical plant, fertiliser plant, and gas processing facility EPC projects conduct HAZID, HAZOP, LOPA, and FMEA across the safety lifecycle.
- 02
Brownfield revamp projects conduct HAZID and HAZOP for modification scope; existing safety studies remain valid for unchanged scope.
- 03
Indian PSU greenfield projects conduct safety studies per OISD framework requirements alongside ASME / IEC standards.
- 04
Operations safety reviews during operating phase use What-If sessions and HAZOP revalidation cycles to verify continued safety compliance.
How does Pathnovo handle Safety Study Types?
Pathnovo's HAZOP Safety Intelligence pillar digitises HAZOP, HAZID, LOPA, and What-If studies from PDF reports into structured queryable registers. Each study type maps to specific lifecycle stages and supports OISD audit-readiness, SIS lifecycle deliverables, and ongoing operational safety reviews.
Frequently Asked Questions
What safety study types are used in EPC?
Common safety study types: HAZID (hazard identification), HAZOP (deviation analysis), HAZAN (consequence quantification), What-If (open-ended discovery), LOPA (layer of protection quantification), FMEA (failure mode analysis). Each serves a specific safety lifecycle stage; greenfield projects typically conduct HAZID, HAZOP, LOPA, and FMEA in sequence.
What is the difference between HAZAN and HAZOP?
HAZOP is structured node-by-node deviation analysis using P&IDs that identifies hazards and existing safeguards qualitatively. HAZAN is the consequence and frequency quantification for specific hazard scenarios, often using Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) methods. HAZAN typically follows HAZOP to quantify identified hazards.
When is What-If used vs HAZOP?
What-If is an open-ended hazard discussion using engineering judgement and structured 'what if?' questions. Used at early design stages or incident investigation. HAZOP is structured P&ID-driven deviation analysis used at detailed design stage. What-If is broader and less structured; HAZOP is narrower and more rigorous.
What is FMEA in process industries?
FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) is the systematic review of failure modes per component or equipment item. Outputs a structured table of failure modes, effects, severity, detection, and risk priority number (RPN). In process industries FMEA is used for critical rotating equipment reliability and safety system design.
Can Pathnovo extract multiple safety study types?
Yes. Pathnovo's HAZOP Safety Intelligence pillar digitises HAZOP, HAZID, LOPA, and What-If studies from PDF reports into structured queryable registers. Each study type maps to specific lifecycle stages and supports OISD audit-readiness.
Related Pages
HAZOP Safety Intelligence
HAZOP, HAZID, LOPA, What-If register digitisation.
HAZID Standard
Early-stage hazard identification study.
LOPA Standard
Layer of Protection Analysis for SIL classification.
SIL Standard
Safety Integrity Level driven by LOPA.
OISD 118 Standard
Indian regulatory framework requiring multi-study safety lifecycle.
See what your documents actually contain.
Send us 10 documents from your current project. We extract, reconcile, and show you exactly what we find in 48 hours, before any contract.
If the accuracy isn't what we promised, you owe us nothing.